Law Essay

p The Law Process 1 RUNNING might point : The Law Process The Law Process in the 12 violent Men[Name of Author][Name of School][Name of Professor][Course Number] The Law Process in the 12 Angry Men12 angry men is a movie blanket(a) of surprises powered by the 12 jurywomans who was to examine an eighteen-year old hu creations whom was impeach for killing his father . These jurywomans where mainly are on their old and basically , belongs to the middle class society . They were brought unneurotic to handle the case of the young men and to decide whether the accuse allow be judged guilty or non guilty . The parole s sprightliness will dep termination on the conclusion of the 12 jurors if they ll had a hale finality of guilty and will be brought into electrical chair as a punishmentThe story circles in the argument wh ether the male child will be automatically criminate guilty without examining the incident . This was so , because they were pretty sure that the man was guilty because of the strong evidences presented by the testimonials of the old woman and the otherwise neighborhood nevertheless juror 8 could not just argue with the stay on eleven jurors because for him , it is a life that they were talking in the bloodbath room . They might be wasting a life if ever they made a mistake in the closing . He pointed out that they sire t know the real law so they bugger off to cross-examine everything . It became a tragic for the juror 8 to convince the remaining eleven . After having some(prenominal) intelligent discussions , though the eleven jurors showed strong argument that the son must be guilty , for nominateful by little , at the end , they had a unanimous decision of not guiltyAt the demote of the boy , we can strongly say that he does , have the justice . There are several testimonies that cod t authen! tically proved that he was guilty .

Personally , I was not comfortable with the outcome of the streak . First , the rill was not made in a due outgrowth . If you ll chance upon , the whole trial was aspectated . It was mostly composed of assessment of the jurors . But I rattling admire the courage of the juror 8 to withstand of what he believes was supposed to do . split second , the jurors were just mislead with the argument . All the juror 8 wants was to have a fair trial with the case . He wanted to first hear the whole case in advance bringing one s life into death . But at the end , the trial seems to be a subject of choosing betwixt guilty or not guilty . by chance slightly of the jurors were just brought up the situation and pressure , for at the end , they all decide to have a unanimous decision of not guilty After all , they dumb don t know the truth . On the side of the dupe the trial was not fair for having that fast decision . What if they boy really killed his father ? No one knowsThe law...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper